tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9939966.post392560398123874974..comments2024-03-28T14:16:51.745+05:30Comments on Known Turf: A little more truth, now we're talking about truthAnnie Zaidihttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08687223598027157611noreply@blogger.comBlogger13125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9939966.post-89842100327571272722020-12-26T12:13:18.567+05:302020-12-26T12:13:18.567+05:30I truly like to reading your post. Thank you so mu...I truly like to reading your post. Thank you so much for taking the time to share such a nice information. <a href="https://www.indoroutes.com/" rel="nofollow">Golden Triangle Tour Package</a><br />Aditi Guptahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15902180425858441362noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9939966.post-82759230486019884662010-07-06T18:48:03.012+05:302010-07-06T18:48:03.012+05:30But hold on... you said up there:
"But until ...But hold on... you said up there:<br />"But until some evidence surfaces that disproves the security agencies' claim that Ishrat was connected to a terror outfit, how can you accuse a journalist of lying?"<br /><br />I used to suspect Ms.IJ was mixed up with the LeT. Post-Headley its a strong conviction. But that is not the legal view and you seem to have the above statement exactlyJai_Cnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9939966.post-18163637312224831282010-07-06T17:44:15.807+05:302010-07-06T17:44:15.807+05:30Since this thread closed on Ishrat Jehan, it is ve...Since this thread closed on Ishrat Jehan, it is very relevant to place here the latest news:<br /><br />David Cameron Headley, under US custody and protection from any of our 3rd degree, at no risk of extradition, has confirmed that Ishrat Jehan was working with the LeT.<br /><br />This may not be clinching but is a strong pointer Mr.Swami was right.<br /><br />I dont know if Sudeep's Jai_Cnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9939966.post-81232016638439917952010-05-14T13:30:44.362+05:302010-05-14T13:30:44.362+05:30Now, for Ishrat Jahan case:
Praveen's article...Now, for Ishrat Jahan case:<br /><br />Praveen's article is founded on the premise that the lady and the three men who were killed by the Gujarat Police were indeed terrorists and they had plans to kill 'Hindu fundamentalist leaders'. He writes without a matter of doubt: "<i>While members of the group did indeed plan a suicide-squad attack on Hindu fundamentalist leaders, the Sudeephttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05817709159847716725noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9939966.post-20441625006189166362010-05-14T09:40:30.340+05:302010-05-14T09:40:30.340+05:30Sorry Annie, one correction: I am not from the Cou...Sorry Annie, one correction: I am not from the Counter currents editorial team. I was only commenting on the editorial integrity that they (Counter currents) showed, by publishing Praveen Swami's 'answers'. <br /><br />An intergrity that I think is missing in <b>The Hindu</b>. Many people, including Adv Prashant Bhushan, have written to N Ram with a lot of evidences against what Mr Sudeephttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05817709159847716725noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9939966.post-91164749836354448092010-05-14T01:19:40.163+05:302010-05-14T01:19:40.163+05:30Oops. My limited html skills put the links out of ...Oops. My limited html skills put the links out of the letter. Here are the links from the concluding para of the comment above:<br />"Parenthetically, on the charge that I mindlessly reflect the positions of the state, you may wish to see my critique of of the investigation of the 2006 Mumbai bombings, which you can find here (http://www.hindu.com/2006/10/18/stories/2006101801331200.htm) andAnnie Zaidihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08687223598027157611noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9939966.post-1437641754565776602010-05-14T01:11:32.485+05:302010-05-14T01:11:32.485+05:30And here is what Mr Swami sent back to me when I r...And here is what Mr Swami sent back to me when I raised the question of the NHRC report in the Batla House encounter case.<br />"There are a number of points in the JTSA statement; many are questions of opinion, and I have no desire to engage in further disputation on these. I agree with you that the substantial fact they have raised is that of the credibility of the National Human Rights Annie Zaidihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08687223598027157611noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9939966.post-5620898216131937452010-05-14T01:09:24.149+05:302010-05-14T01:09:24.149+05:30Sudeep, thanks for the response. However, you are ...Sudeep, thanks for the response. However, you are incorrect when you say that Mr Swami is the only or one of the only journalists who fail to attribute facts to a source(and both you and the JTSA need to learn to be a bit more careful about spellings! Swami doesn't spell his name with a 'y' and anyone who reads his work and takes the trouble to put out press releases against him oughtAnnie Zaidihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08687223598027157611noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9939966.post-61319600498959421752010-05-13T14:53:55.940+05:302010-05-13T14:53:55.940+05:30clash and Annie, here's more on Ishrat Jahan c...clash and Annie, here's more on Ishrat Jahan case:<br /><br />An 'investigation story' by Praveen Swamy (<a href="http://www.hindu.com/fline/fl2114/stories/20040716004101800.htm" rel="nofollow">link</a>) claimed that the IB used an Ahmedabad lawyer sympathetic to the LeT to run the Modi assassination plot (which Ishrat and Javed were part of!!) as a sting operation. <i>“The lawyer wasSudeephttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05817709159847716725noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9939966.post-48627720886180710572010-05-13T10:15:27.191+05:302010-05-13T10:15:27.191+05:30Hi Annie,
Thanks for taking the pain to write to ...Hi Annie,<br /><br />Thanks for taking the pain to write to Sri Swamy and get his side of the story (and some glimpse to his sources!)<br /><br />Counter currents published this 'rebuttal' by Praveen Swamy, and held their 'editorial integrity'. JTSA has responded to this [<a href="http://kafila.org/2010/05/02/swami-friends-jtsas-response-to-praveen-swami/" rel="nofollow">Swamy andSudeephttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05817709159847716725noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9939966.post-37441601859842408232010-05-03T12:13:18.611+05:302010-05-03T12:13:18.611+05:30jusst a ismaal qoshton -
What has PS got to say a...jusst a ismaal qoshton -<br /><br />What has PS got to say about Shorabhuddin,kausar bi case? Dint he pen down stories about that?<br /><br />What about the ishrat jahan case? what about that story?<br /><br />both these cases are being challenged in courts now.<br /><br />does that mean what he wrote about these 2 incidents still holds ground? <br /><br />you know a small qoshton.clashhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14968784384859928316noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9939966.post-63893033808553388192010-05-03T11:51:45.890+05:302010-05-03T11:51:45.890+05:30Annie,
1. I have no problems with the basic issu...Annie,<br /><br />1. I have no problems with the basic issue you raise here but I think the JTSA article should be covered under FoS. Mr.Swami can rebut. He can sue for libel if possible.<br /><br />2. [Praveen Swami]: "..I trust no sensible person would have objections to the targeting of these murderous criminals..."<br /><br />I think this is the crux, the core of the disagreement. Jai_Chttp://jaics.blogspot.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9939966.post-12873267458230510642010-04-29T19:59:45.219+05:302010-04-29T19:59:45.219+05:30Kudos, Annie. And thank you.Kudos, Annie. And thank you.??!https://www.blogger.com/profile/03791417518093723373noreply@blogger.com