It's the freshest thing I've seen all
year. And I'd seen it at least three times before and maybe a couple
more times in bits and parts. But so far, I'd only caught the film on
cable TV, and I had never seen the first ten minutes.
This time I was milling around, eating
too much cheese. Impatient for Chasme Buddoor (the 1981 Chashme
Buddoor, the funny one, the original one, the one that could pull off
both, unself-conscious and self-conscious humour, and romance,
and still stay watchable) on the big screen.
And then I was in my seat, sitting through the trailer of Yamla Pagla
Deewana 2 and glad, sort of, because any poor iota of
curiosity you may have felt was successfully squelched (although I did think that this was a less
annoying trailer than the trailer of Chashme Baddoor, the new version, where the only novelty hinted at was shorter skirts).
Once the film began, I was surprised at how much I was laughing. Surprised that,
despite the huge potential for feminist discomfort in this sort of story, I was not made
uncomfortable by the jokes. Watching the film with
grown-up eyes, I was noticing more and more cleverness in the
script and the vision of director Sai Paranjpe.
For instance, two of the male characters,
Jomo and Omi (Ravi Vaswani and Rakesh Bedi), are always chasing
women in overt, slightly offensive ways but they never succeed in
wooing anyone. They chhedo-fy any woman they see, not discriminating
on the basis of class or colour or body shape. And it is obvious to
the viewer that the reason they never succeed is that their approach
to women is all wrong. Following, whistling, passing comments,
showing up without an invitation, offering lacy kerchiefs as bait –
such 'woo-ing' is not just annoying, it is doomed to failure.
The writer-director makes it clear that
women are not likely to be won over this way and she is able to do
so with a sense of fun. The boys don't always get slapped. They also
get taken for a ride by some of the women.
However, given the right circumstances,
romance does blossom. A chance encounter is
important but equally important is behaviour. And mutual attraction.
For instance, when Neha (Deepti Naval) meets Siddharth (Farooq
Sheikh), he comes across as a decent chap. He is a bit
awkward, but not unduly shy. He's educated, hard-working, and
considerate about her feelings. He will not let her touch a dirty
towel even if it is only so that she might wash it. And he's not pompous or dishonest.
In turn, she gives him a chance. She
trusts him enough to give him an opportunity to meet her again (I
will not describe how, because you MUST go watch the film). She
acknowledges her desire too, when they both meet again and it is now evident that both parties are actually interested. Their mutual
interest is key to the film. Everything hinges on this – that they
like and trust each other.
This is one of the major reasons
why I adore the film. The filmmaker is neither placing the burden of
coyness on the woman, nor placing women in general on some
pedestal of infallibility. Just like men, some are shy and some are
'chaalu' and some are neither.
I also wonder if there was a subtle point made about 'gaze' as well. Whenever Jomo and Omi are following girls, the women are often walking away with hips swinging wildly, exaggeratedly. This does not happen with Siddharth or Neha.
I also wonder if there was a subtle point made about 'gaze' as well. Whenever Jomo and Omi are following girls, the women are often walking away with hips swinging wildly, exaggeratedly. This does not happen with Siddharth or Neha.
Another thing I love is the deliberate
spoofiness of the scenes invoking Hindi film references. Most often,
this is during Jomo/Omi-Neha scenes. The filmmaker is perfectly aware of
how stereotypical (or just silly) Bollywood characters can be,
and she exploits every one of those stereotypes for laughs. Through songs,
through costumes, through dialogue. But when she is not being spoofy,
she is also capable of using filmi tropes in a tender way. For instance, when showing how Neha is upset, whilst she is
singing a sad song with her music guru.
The other things I love about the
original Chasme Buddoor is the attention to detail, and when detail
is deemed important. For instance, at one point, Omi and Neha are
seated in a boat. She is wearing a gleaming white
garaara (and it is a garaara, not a sharaara, as it should be in the
Lucknavi poetic imagination), and the dupatta is kept in place on her
head with the help of a hair clip. An ordinary black hair clip that
shows up clearly on the white fabric.
I noticed that hair clip with a little
shock. Then I realised that I have NEVER seen a black hair
clip on the head of any Hindi film actress on any big-screen outing. Their
dupattas appear to be super-glued to their heads. This small detail is unimportant, especially since the whole song is meant to be spoofy. But it totally distracted me because I began to think of how the mirage of perfection has
become super important in modern films. The women's clothes are just
so, their bodies just so, their breasts of a particular size and if
not just so naturally, then silicon-ed up to that particular just-so
size.
Neha wears her clothes the way an
ordinary middle/upper class girl might. She dresses well, in both
western and Indian outfits. She wears heels. And when she steps
out, after her music lessons, she actually puts her sandals on again! This is an important detail. It deepens the scene – a hint of
tradition executed wordlessly; in a blink of an eye, it adds to
Neha's character and allows a better sense of 'place' within a film.
But this is a director's detail. It's not a costume detail.
Similarly, the boys are all in towels
when they are alone, or lungis with t-shirts (the same t-shirts they
might wear outdoors). And they share clothes. But no dialogue is
wasted, with one character asking to borrow the other's shirt. It's
just done, more or less the way young flat-mates do in real life.
Another example – Omi is shown
vigorously exercising in one scene, and that tells us how he feels
about being plumper than the other two. He never says a word about
wanting to lose weight. It is just suggested, which is enough to
deepen his character for the viewer.
Yet another example – All the boys
talk often to Lallan Miyan (Saeed Jaffrey), the neighbourhood paan-wala
to whom they owe money for cigarettes. This includes Siddharth. But
what's touching is that he actually talks to the elder man. He
confides in him because he's a student in a new town and probably doesn't
have anyone else to share his feelings with.
These details are signs of accomplished
filmmaking, of course - embedded gently and absorbed intuitively. I
was noticing them only because I have watched the film at least three
times and also because it is so rare in Hindi film 'comedies'
these days.
I could go on and on. There
are a dozen things to say about why this film still feels so
modern, so honest, so delicately balanced. But I should actually stop
and allow you – whoever is reading this – to go and catch a show
on the big screen. It's totally worth the money. Probably one of the
cleanest romcom+buddy films you're likely to watch this year.
Just remember to watch the one with 'u'
in the Buddoor. Book here.
Hey Annie! It was great meeting you at the book reading of your Love Stories...
ReplyDeleteI remember commenting on Smriti's fb post which had a link to this piece of yours.
I share your thoughts on this beautiful film. One of my favourite scenes is when they are eating tooty frooty icecream. Such a normal thing that couples do but most Hindi films don't show it.
Hope to get my hands on the dvd!
Best wishes,
Anjali
hey anjali
ReplyDeletenice meeting you too. :)